Kommandozentrale » or is appointed by the remaining members of t

Three months after House Democrats issued a report concluding that the NFL improperly sought to influence a major government study on football and brain disease, their Republican counterparts called for an independent review into the controversy.In a 21-page letter to the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services, Republican leaders from the Energy and Commerce Committee requested the review to determine whether proper procedures were followed by officials with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its fundraising arm.The letter suggests that NIH officials engaged representatives from the NFL throughout the process and tried to resolve the conflict by offering a compromise solution -- reinforcing the perception that there was nothing improper about the NFLs actions.The questions and concerns raised by these events are vital to the integrity of research and the grant award decision-making process, concluded the letter, written by Reps. Fred Upton of Michigan, Tim Murphy and Joseph Pitts of Pennsylvania, and Michael Burgess of Texas.In May, Democratic leaders from the committee issued a 91-page report that described a behind-the-scenes campaign by top NFL health officials to strip a $16 million grant from a prominent Boston University researcher who has been critical of the league. The Republican letter provided little new information about the NFLs campaign, but it suggested that the league may have been convinced that its input was welcomed by senior NIH officials who agreed to discuss the matter, in possible violation of NIH regulations.The Democratic report stemmed from interviews with officials at the NIH and the Foundation for the NIH (FNIH) as well as the NFLs top health and safety official. It also cited emails between the parties. The report singled out Dr. Richard Ellenbogen, the co-chair of the NFLs Head, Neck and Spine Committee. Ellenbogen was a co-investigator on a competing grant proposal, which the report said NFL officials tried to convince the NIH to fund. Ellenbogen was a primary example of the conflicts of interest between his role as a researcher and his role as an NFL adviser, according to the report.Ellenbogen, however, was not interviewed by the Democrats, and he denied to the Republicans that he ever had sought to influence the NIH process, as he had previously to Outside the Lines and other media outlets.Ellenbogen, the chair of the Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Washington, is the subject of an internal investigation at UW over the findings by the Democrats.The Republican letter said the review was necessary because this controversy has tarnished the reputations of some leading brain trauma experts.We stand by our findings that the NFL improperly attempted to influence NIH on its brain injury research, and that FNIH did not adequately fulfill its role of serving as an intermediary between NIH and the NFL, an Energy and Commerce Democratic Committee spokesperson wrote to Outside the Lines.The controversy stems from a $30 million donation the NFL made to the NIH in 2012. At the time, the league described the grant as unrestricted, and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell insisted that the league would let NIH make the decisions on how best to spend the money. The first $12 million of that funding was allocated in 2013 to two groups to study the defining characteristics of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), the brain disease that has been found in dozens of deceased NFL players and that experts have linked to repetitive head trauma. However, Outside the Lines reported in December that the NFL had backed out of using most of the remaining funds on a $16 million study that had been awarded to Robert Stern, a prominent Boston University researcher.Soon after, the Democratic committee launched its investigation.The league has said that its officials expressed concerns about Stern but that they did so appropriately. And the Republicans letter suggests that if the NFLs actions were inappropriate, the NIH should have addressed that with the league rather than encouraging ongoing discussion.The NFL issued a statement Thursday afternoon repeating prior comments that it had never wavered in its commitment to advance the science and understanding of concussions and that it looked forward to cooperating in a review.Ellenbogen and three other members of the NFLs Head, Neck and Spine Committee issued their own statement, saying they welcome a fair and balanced review and look forward to engaging fully in the process, a courtesy we were not provided by the committees minority staff.The Republican letter comes one day after the NFL announced a $100 million initiative designed to focus on concussion research and technologies to lessen head trauma.Discount Soccer Jerseys . The return match will take place next Wednesday. Udinese leads Fiorentina 2-1 in the other semifinal. Napoli staged a second-half comeback from two goals down after Gervinhos opener and a stunning strike from Kevin Strootman. Cheap Liverpool Jerseys China . Just not the game. Kyle Palmieri scored two straight goals in the third period to rally the Anaheim Ducks past the Philadelphia Flyers 3-2 on Tuesday night. http://www.cheapsoccerchina.com/cheap-juventus-jerseys-china_136s.html . Jane Virtanen scored two, and Alex Roach and Elliott Peterson rounded out the offence for the Hitmen (40-15-6). Brady Brassart chipped in with three assists. Colton McCarthy scored twice, Brayden Point had a goal and two assists, and Jack Rodewald also scored for the Warriors (15-35-9), who were 2 for 5 on the power play. Cheap Soccer Jerseys Outlet . But now that hes in the NHL, the Calgary Flames centre showed big improvement in that department by scoring the winner in the eighth round of a 5-4 shootout victory over the Winnipeg Jets on Monday. Cheap Barcelona Jerseys China . The Nashville Predators were glad their captain was still on their side. Weber had a goal and two assists, and Roman Josi scored the shootout winner to lift the Predators to a 4-3 win over the Flyers on Thursday night.KEY QUESTIONS IN THE ARLC V NRL CLUBS DEBATE?:* WHAT ARE THE MAIN STICKING POINTS?The clubs were promised 130% of the salary cap in funding by the NRL late last year, however they were told on Wednesday parts of that original memorandum of understanding were off the table. They also want a greater say in the running of the game. The NRL says its focusing on finalising the collective bargaining agreement and salary cap first, as well as directing money into grassroots rugby league* WHO WANTS ARLC CHAIRMAN JOHN GRANT GONE?:The clubs are understood to have sent a letter of no confidence in Grant to the ARLC, which could result in an emergency general meeting next week if he doesnt stand down. Newcastle, St George Illawarra and the Wests Tigers - all of whom have recently been bailed out by the NRL - are understood to have signed the letter, while Gold Coast are believed to be weighing up their options. Grant claims he has not received such a letter* HOW COULD GRANT BE REMOVED?:There are 26 members of the ARLC, eight of whom are commissioners. Of the remaining 18 (16 clubs, NSWRL and QRL), 75 per cent - or 14 members - would need to support an emergency general meeting, where a vote would be taken on Grants future* WHO COULD REPLACE HIM?:Any replacement director is appointed by the remaining members of the commission, as pper its constitution.dddddddddddd. The clubs could suggest they appoint former ARL chief John Quayle, NSWRL chairman George Peponis or former Nine Network boss David Gyngell to the role. If the new chair was to come from within the ARLC, its understood CSR chairman Jeremy Sutcliffe could be a popular option among the clubs* WOULD THERE BE FURTHER CHANGES?:The clubs are also understood to want two seats on the independent commission - they currently have none. There is also the possibility of giving the states one seat. Changes would have to be made to the constitution for that to happen* WHAT IMPACT COULD THIS HAVE ON THE COMPETITION?:This is potentially the biggest threat to the game since the Super League war, however the possibility of a breakaway competition is remote. Only the Wests Tigers, St George Illawarra, Newcastle and Gold Coast have signed participation agreements beyond 2018* WHATS GRANTS RESPONSE BEEN?:Grant fronted the media on Friday to say he planned on being in the job for a further five years. He is attempting to organise another meeting with the clubs for next week, and has appointed Australian Olympic Committee president John Coates to lead a review of the constitution ' ' '