s point clear: If I had a vote, to be honest, I wouldnt pick eith

BOSTON -- Doc Rivers will be the next coach of the Los Angeles Clippers if the NBA approves the rare but not unprecedented trade of an active coach, a Boston Celtics official told The Associated Press on Sunday night. The deal would bring Boston a first-round draft pick in 2015, according to the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because it is pending a trade call with the NBA office. Rivers, who had three years and $21 million left on his contract with the Celtics, must also reach an agreement on a new deal with the Clippers. Celtics spokesman Jeff Twiss said the team had no announcement. The tentative agreement on Sunday wraps up weeks of haggling over the deal and frees Rivers from presiding over the dismantling of the team that won the franchises record 17th NBA title in 2008. The Celtics and Clippers have also discussed sending Kevin Garnett to Los Angeles in a package with Rivers for draft choices, centre DeAndre Jordan and point guard Eric Bledsoe. But NBA commissioner David Stern nixed those talks this week, saying teams arent allowed to trade active players for a coach. A deal for Garnett could still happen, but the teams would have to convince the league that it was a separate deal. The 37-year-old big man has a no-trade clause in the contract that will pay him 23.5 million over the next two years, but it is believed he would waive it to be reunited with Rivers on the West Coast. He has also discussed retiring. Boston could also cut ties with Paul Pierce, the longest-tenured member of the team, who is due to earn $15.3 million next season; he could be bought out for $5 million. Pierce will be 36 by the 2013-14 opener and showed signs of slowing down this season, when he averaged the fewest minutes per game in his career. Rivers took over the Celtics in 2004 in the midst of the longest title drought in franchise history and -- with thanks to the New Big Three of Garnett, Pierce and Ray Allen -- guided them to the 2008 NBA title. They returned to the NBA Finals two years later, losing to the Los Angeles Lakers in seven games. But the Celtics have regressed steadily since then, twice failing to get past the Miami Heat in the Eastern Conference playoffs. This year they finished third in the Atlantic Division -- they had won it five straight times -- and lost to the New York Knicks in the first round. That convinced many that it was time to rebuild -- a process Rivers was reluctant to supervise. If the Celtics unload Garnett and Pierce, that would leave them with point guard Rajon Rondo as their only established star. Rivers had the second-longest tenure of any NBA coach to San Antonios Gregg Popovich, compiling a 416-305 record in Boston that was the third-most wins in franchise history behind Red Auerbach (795) and Tommy Heinsohn (427). He also spent four-plus seasons with the Orlando Magic and is 587-473 in all. Trades for coaches have occurred about a half-dozen times in NBA history, most recently in 2007 when the Heat received compensation for allowing Stan Van Gundy to go to the Orlando Magic. In 1983, the Chicago Bulls sent a second-round draft pick to Atlanta as compensation for coach Kevin Loughery. The Hawks used that pick to take Glenn "Doc" Rivers.Tigers Jerseys China . The person spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the Lions have not announced the hiring, which was first reported by ESPN. Lombardi, the grandson of former Green Bay Hall of Fame coach Vince Lombardi, has been an offensive assistant on Sean Paytons New Orleans staff since 2007. Cheap Tigers Jerseys . 1 position. The Mustangs (6-0), who beat Queens 50-31 last weekend, earned 17 first-place votes and 287 points in voting by the Football Reporters of Canada. Western was last ranked first in the country in October 2011. https://www.cheaptigers.com/ . Catch all the action on TSN2 at 11pm et/8pm pt. The nine-time Big 12 champion Jayhawks are positioning themselves for another title, as they have run out to a flawless 6-0 mark in conference play thus far. Detroit Tigers Gear .Y. -- Sabres defenceman Tyler Myers had no intention of changing his hard-hitting style before taking part in a disciplinary hearing for his illegal check to New Jersey forward Dainius Zubrus head. Custom Detroit Tigers Jerseys . Detroit and Boston are deadlocked, 1-1, and Tigers manager Jim Leyland could be forgiven if he was caught rationalizing instead of dissecting how his club could blow a 5-1 lead late in Game 2.Derek Carr had a shot at sealing up the MVP award Thursday night and failed. Had Carr put up big numbers in a win over the Chiefs on national television and pushed the Raiders to 11-2 and atop an extremely tough division, he becomes a huge betting favorite. Carr didnt get much help from his receivers, and it sure was cold at Arrowhead, but when you average 2.9 yards per pass attempt, something has gone wrong.Carr left the MVP race wide open with a quarter of the season to go, and there are plenty of plausible candidates. Tom Brady could sneak back in if the Patriots win out to go 14-2. Russell Wilson might even have a shot. Von Miller is the favorite for Defensive Player of the Year and could threaten for MVP if he goes on a tear. Dak Prescott has some support.With all that being said, its fair to say Ezekiel Elliott could be the toughest competition for Carr, even if the Cowboys are likely to give Elliott a reduced workload over the final two weeks of the season if they clinch the top seed in the NFC. He has put up big numbers, and has been a big part of the finishing blow the Dallas offense has managed to achieve over and over.But I want to use Elliotts candidacy to throw another name out there.I dont think he has a serious shot of winning the MVP award, but he probably deserves some consideration, and the reasons why some might reject his candidacy might also be reason to review your thoughts on Elliott. I dont think you can vote for Elliott as MVP if hes not even the best running back in football, and theres a reasonable case to be made that the best running back in football this season is David Johnson.The Johnson vs. Elliott debateThis is easy, right? Elliott has run the ball 263 times for 1,285 yards and 12 touchdowns, while Johnson has run the ball 228 times for 1,005 yards and 11 scores. Elliott has run for 280 more yards while averaging nearly a half-yard more per carry. Johnson has been solid, but Dallas rookie sensation has been more productive and more efficient as a rusher. Problem solved.Wait, why did I even write this article?Well, theres another thing these two players have to do: catch the football. This is 2016, after all, when teams throw the ball more than ever before. While some teams have a third-down back whose role is primarily to serve as a receiver, both Dallas and Arizona use their stud starters as receiving backs, too. The numbers there? Elliott has caught 28 passes for 322 yards and a touchdown, a chunk of which came on a single screen pass on which an untouched Elliott scampered 83 yards to the house.Johnsons receiving numbers are on another level. He has caught 64 passes for 704 yards and four touchdowns, which would a respectable level of output even without considering the second-year mans rushing statistics. The difference between Johnson and Elliott as receivers is roughly about the difference in production between Brandon Marshall and Malcolm Mitchell this season.Whats even more impressive about Johnson is the way hes gaining those receiving yards. Most backs pick up a fair chunk of their yardage on screens, which can at times be something closer to delayed runs: Youre not beating anybody in coverage, and you have offensive linemen out in front of you to help create running lanes after the catch. The yards still count, but the degree of difficulty is lower.More than perhaps any other back in the league, the Cardinals basically just use Johnson as a regular old wide receiver a fair amount of the time. Atlanta does this with both Devonta Freeman and Tevin Coleman, and other teams will line up receiving backs like Theo Riddick or Dion Lewis in the slot, but Johnson moves around the formation and runs route combinations alongside Larry Fitzgerald and Michael Floyd like hes a wideout. Bruce Arians has no qualms about believing he has a mismatch with Johnson against just about any other player on the defensive side.The typical receiving back will accrue about 35 percent of his receiving yardage on screens. For Zeke, that number is up to 74.8 percent, which is the highest in the league among backs with 200 receiving yards or more. Outside of screen passes, he has 13 catches for 81 yards. Johnson, meanwhile, has used screens to get to 22.2 percent of his receiving yards this year. On passes that arent screens, he has 51 catches for 548 yards and three scores. No other back in the league is within 200 yards of DJ as a receiver on non-screens.Including screens, other receiving yardage and those rushing statistics, heres what Elliott and Johnson have done from scrimmage this season, respectively:On virtually the same number of touches, Johnson has outgained Elliott by 102 yards while scoring two more touchdowns and fumbling less frequently. If you want to argue about each players respective context within his team, well, Johnson is responsible for a higher percentage of his teams output, too:Im defining touchdowns as passing and rrushing scores here, and Johnson has 15 of Arizonas 32 scores this season.dddddddddddd Thats not unprecedented, but it is impressive; just one back in the past five seasons, Jamaal Charles in 2013, has scored more than 45 percent of his teams touchdowns in a particular year. (The record, as far as I can tell, is Emmitt Smith taking 15 of Dallas 26 offensive scores in 1996 to the house, for a 57.6 percent clip.) Nobody would argue that it has been the better unit of the pair, but you could argue Johnson has been more important to the Cardinals offense than Elliott has been to his.And of course, the qualitative element in play here is the supporting cast. Elliott plays behind the best offensive line in football, a unit so effective I nominated it for MVP several weeks ago. He has a budding superstar quarterback in Prescott, who leads the league in QBR. Elliott makes his quarterback and offensive line better, but they also make it far easier for him to do his thing, too.Lets compare that to the group Johnson plays with. His quarterback is Carson Palmer, who was an MVP candidate last year but has slipped significantly in 2016; his completion percentage and yards per attempt have dropped while his interception rate and sack rate have risen. Johnsons offensive line also has hardly been helpful. Arizona lost veteran guard Evan Mathis for the season after four games and star left tackle Jared Veldheer after eight. Center A.Q. Shipley is one of the worst starting pivots in football, and the Cards are down to disappointing right tackle D.J. Humphries as their left tackle. The right side of the line is John Wetzel and Ulrick John, a pair of undrafted free agents who bounced around practice squads before starting their first games with the Cardinals this season. Not exactly Zack Martin and Doug Free.So heres the question: If Johnson has been more productive in a far more difficult situation, how has he not been the better running back?Its hard to find an argument for Elliott. If you count the plays when Johnson was targeted but did not catch the ball as plays generating zero yards, the average Elliott play has gone for 5.43 yards per attempt, while Johnsons plays have generated 5.27 yards per effort. While Elliott has spent plenty of his debut season in garbage time, it has mostly been in running situations where teams are gearing up to stop him. The Cardinals, meanwhile, have been able to get Johnson the ball against teams that are in soft coverages late in blowouts, although thats also not a huge facet of what Johnson has done, either -- 119 of Johnsons 704 yards have come with Arizona down 14 points or more.Instead, the obvious reason why people are considering Elliott as an MVP candidate without mentioning Johnson is the fact that Dallas is one of the surprises of the season at 11-1, while Arizona has been an enormous disappointment at 5-6-1. The offense has driven most of the difference between the two, as the Cardinals have allowed 23 more points than the Cowboys while Dallas has outscored Arizona by 57 points. The Cardinals defense has been much better by DVOA, but most MVP voters arent consulting advanced statistics as part of their vote.Again, though, where is the evidence that the enormous difference between the Dallas offense and Arizona attack is due to Elliott being a much better player than Johnson? You would probably take the Cardinals receiving corps over that of Dallas, especially when healthy, but theres a huge, obvious swath of difference in output between these two teams at offensive line and quarterback. Arent they far more likely to be the parties most responsible for the offensive gap between the Cowboys and Cardinals, given that Elliott and Johnson have been about as productive as one another?I should make this point clear: If I had a vote, to be honest, I wouldnt pick either Elliott or Johnson.Theyre both phenomenal players and have been excellent this season, but for a running back to win the MVP award over a quarterback, he has to either set records or single-handedly propel a team beyond its wildest expectations. Adrian Peterson did that in 2012, when he ran for 2,097 yards as the focal point of a Vikings team with Christian Ponder at quarterback and Michael Jenkins and Jerome Simpson as his starting wideouts for half the year.Between these two, Johnson is the one carrying his team, although he isnt getting it very far. I can understand being reticent to vote for the leading offensive weapon on a sub-.500 team as the leagues most valuable player, but I think its fair to say Johnson has either been the leagues best running back or someone very close to that honor in 2016. And if we have to ask whether Elliott is even the best player at his own position, chances are hes not the best one at any position this season. ' ' '